NYSC Bars HND Holders Without IT Experience from National Service

NYSC's New Policy: A Closer Look at the Implications for Polytechnic Graduates and the Role Government Should Play

The National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) recently implemented a significant policy change that has sparked widespread reactions across Nigeria. This policy bars polytechnic graduates who lack proof of completing the mandatory 12-month Industrial Training (IT) from participating in the one-year national service. The NYSC, through its Acting Director of Press and Public Relations, Caroline Lembu, emphasized the importance of the IT program as a prerequisite for the national service.

The IT certificate is not just a formality; it is mandatory for all polytechnic students

Lembu stated, reinforcing the NYSC's commitment to upholding the quality of graduates entering the service. The new rule has far-reaching consequences, not only for the affected graduates of HND but also for the economy, the education sector, and the nation at large.

What This Means for Affected Graduates

For National Higher Diploma (HND) graduates, the NYSC has historically been a crucial rite of passage, providing them with a platform to gain practical experience, contribute to national development, and secure better employment opportunities. However, with this new policy, graduates who did not complete their industrial training are now ineligible to register for the NYSC national service.

This policy is particularly consequential because many students may have faced challenges in securing industrial attachments during their National Diploma (ND) programs due to factors such as limited availability of placement opportunities, especially in remote areas. As a result, these graduates now face an uncertain future, as the lack of an NYSC certificate could significantly hinder their employment prospects in a country where this certificate is often a prerequisite for job applications and holding public offices.

Economic and Educational Implications

Economically, the policy could lead to a reduction in the number of graduates entering the workforce through the NYSC program, potentially affecting the availability of skilled labour in certain sectors. On the other hand, it could also compel polytechnic institutions to strengthen their industrial training programs, ensuring that students gain the practical experience necessary to succeed in the job market.

From an educational standpoint, the policy may incentivize polytechnic institutions to better integrate industrial training into their curricula, making it a more substantial component of the overall academic experience. This could lead to a more skilled and experienced graduate workforce, ultimately benefiting the economy in the long term.

Merits of the Policy

One of the primary merits of the new NYSC policy is that it encourages the completion of industrial training, which is crucial for students to gain hands-on experience in their fields of study. By enforcing this requirement, the NYSC aims to produce graduates who are better prepared for the challenges of the workplace.

Additionally, the policy ensures that the industrial training, which is meant to be a critical part of the polytechnic education, is not bypassed, or neglected. This emphasis on practical experience could lead to a more competent and competitive workforce, which is essential for national development.

Demerits of the Policy

However, the policy is not without its drawbacks. One significant disadvantage is that it may disproportionately affect students from disadvantaged backgrounds or regions where industrial training opportunities are scarce. These students may find it difficult to secure the required industrial attachments, thereby being unfairly excluded from the NYSC program.

Moreover, the sudden implementation of the policy has caught many graduates off guard, particularly those who have already completed their HND programs and were preparing for the national service. The lack of adequate notice or transitional arrangements could result in significant disruptions to their career plans.

Stakeholder Reactions

The policy has received mixed reactions from stakeholders. The Academic Staff Union of Polytechnics (ASUP) has expressed support for the policy, highlighting the industrial attachment as a vital extension of the ND program. ASUP National President, Shammah Kpanja, noted,

 The one-year industrial attachment is not optional; it’s a crucial part of the training

However, while Some educational analysts have supported the policy, pointing out that while the policy emphasizes the importance of practical training, they have also warned it could exacerbate existing inequalities in the education system. They argue that polytechnic institutions, especially those in less developed areas, may struggle to provide adequate support and placement opportunities for all their students, potentially leaving many unable to meet the new requirements.

Many students and recent graduates have voiced concerns about the challenges of securing IT placements, particularly in less urbanized regions, and have called for more support and resources to be made available to help them fulfil this requirement. The National Association of Polytechnic Students (NAPS) have expressed concerns over the policy. They argue that the lack of adequate IT opportunities, especially in rural areas, puts many students at a disadvantage. They have called on the government to create more industrial training placements and provide financial support for students during their IT period.

Human rights organisations have weighed in, suggesting that the policy could be seen as discriminatory if it disproportionately affects students from marginalised communities. They advocate for the government to ensure equal access to industrial training opportunities across all regions. 

What the Government Should Do

While the policy intends to improve graduate quality, the government needs to improve the infrastructure and opportunities for industrial training across the country.  To ensure that every polytechnic student gets an Industrial Training (IT) placement, the government can take several proactive steps:

1. Collaboration with Industry:

The government should partner with private and public sector companies to create more IT opportunities. By incentivizing companies to take on interns from polytechnics, the government can expand the pool of available placements. This could include tax breaks, subsidies, or other financial incentives for businesses that offer a certain number of IT slots each year.

2. Establishment of IT Placement Offices:

The government could establish dedicated IT placement offices within polytechnic institutions or as part of regional educational departments. These offices would be responsible for coordinating with industries, maintaining a database of available IT opportunities, and assisting students in securing placements.

3. Mandatory IT Programs in Government Agencies:

Government ministries, departments, and agencies (MDAs) could be mandated to reserve a certain percentage of IT slots for polytechnic students. This would not only provide more placements but also expose students to public sector work environments, enhancing their understanding of how government operates.

4. Enhanced Funding for IT Programs:

The government should allocate more funds specifically for IT programs within polytechnics. This funding could be used to establish or expand existing IT offices, provide stipends for students during their IT period, and facilitate partnerships with industries.

5. Digital Platforms for IT Matching:

Creating a national digital platform that connects students with available IT opportunities across the country could streamline the process. Such a platform would allow students to search for IT placements by location, industry, and other relevant criteria, making it easier to find and apply for positions.

6. Strengthening Polytechnic-Industry Relationships:

The government can encourage polytechnics to build strong, ongoing relationships with local industries. This could involve regular meetings, workshops, and collaborations where industries contribute to curriculum development and provide feedback on the skills they need from graduates.

7. Monitoring and Evaluation:

A robust system of monitoring and evaluation should be put in place to track the effectiveness of IT placements and ensure that students are actually gaining valuable experience. Feedback from both students and employers can be used to continuously improve the program.

8. Public Awareness Campaigns:

The government can launch campaigns to raise awareness about the importance of IT programs for students and businesses alike. These campaigns could emphasize the mutual benefits—how students gain valuable experience, while businesses benefit from fresh perspectives and potential future employees.

 By implementing these measures, the government can help ensure that every polytechnic student has access to the IT opportunities they need to complete their education and prepare for their future careers.

Conclusion

The NYSC’s decision to bar polytechnic graduates without IT experience from national service is a policy with significant implications. While it underscores the importance of practical experience in education, it also raises concerns about fairness and accessibility for all students. As the policy takes effect, it will be essential for polytechnic institutions, government bodies, and other stakeholders to work together to ensure that all students have the opportunity to meet these requirements and succeed in their careers.

 Also, read

NYSCAllowance Update